Dr. Malone Updates Jimmy Dore
Get up to date in just over an hour including spotlighting the pharma and media corruption (Bonus: An interesting VAERS event reporting curve)
When you have both Dr. Malone (who is certainly no left wing fanboi) and Jimmy Dore ripping into pharma and media corruption in unison you have a video that I’m amazed is still up on YouTube.
And especially since Dr. Malone starts with a great “bring you all up to date overview” of the current big picture that is reasonably digestible even if you are coming from behind. You know it’s good when even Jimmy has surprised looks of “oh, wow” sporadically as Dr. Malone talks.
How do we get right and left united like this? This is a clue:
And what is the Cliff Notes version of what Dr. Malone proposes at the end for a path forward?
Stop the mass vaccination campaign. Dr. Malone is admitting that Geert Vanden Bossche seems to have been right about mass vaccination causing viral “escape mutants” which can be disastrous to the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike (also see “Marek’s disease in chickens). Instead focus the (currently genetic based) vaccines on elderly and high risk to minimize the inevitable — and already happening — dilution of their efficacy. (And BTW, Malone points out that too much vaccination such as the proposed booster shots can actually be a bad thing for your immune system in general.)
Treat early with re-purposed drugs like Ivermectin, HCQ, etc. Keep people away from a severe course of the disease as much as possible. This is showing reasonable (not perfect of course) success around the world when seriously tried.
Make home rapid tests more widely available (even though they will show many false positives) to do initial sorting of colds, RSV, etc from actual C19.
Use apps (like Johns Hopkins here) to help assess your personal risk and make sensible decisions about things like ivermectin prophylaxis vs vaccines, etc.
And Kim Iversen is coming up on the outside track from a left position — watch the first 10 minutes for a useful update especially if you don’t have enough time for Malone and Dore’s 1 hour+ RN.
Regarding Dr. Malone’s point #4 above which may be new to many of you, I add here an example of an assessment of a healthy 22 yo male with the Johns Hopkins app:
When you do the math this works out to a 1 in ~50,000 per year risk on the top assessment1 and a 1 in ~40,000 risk resulting from the bottom assessment of 1.4 in 1,000,000 when you adjust for the assessed period being only ~3 weeks. And this even just accepts all the likely questionably aggressive assumptions built into the app.
This makes it very clear why the vaccines may do more harm than good at least in those under 40 for instance given the risks for myocarditis, disruption of periods, etc appearing in CDC VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and finally starting to be noted in the FDA’s assessment.
I’m about to do an analysis with the latest data but here’s my latest chart of VAERS C19 vaccine adverse events using delay from date of vaccination based on somewhat dated VAERS data:
Team fear likes to direct criticism at VAERS that it is full of junk2 — but that curve looks very much like one would expect if the reports tended toward being valid rather than just background noise. One could even speculate that the bump at 7 days could be explained by people holding back and treating roughly a week as an understandable “this is not good, I better see a doc” point!
A ballpark of C19 yearly population death rate in the US is 1 in ~1000 (at worst 870 if you look at “9% Uncorrected” which doesn’t account for seasonality — and inflated of course but just leave that there) and this says the risk is 2% of that. 0.02 * 0.001 = 0.00002 = 1 / 50,000
The more likely problem given an intuitive curve like this is that VAERS is just not “full enough” given its relative obscurity and all the anecdotes of suppression against using it even when people know about it.