Iceland has totally stopped Moderna -- and Scandinavia is stopping it for younger ages
baizuobu.substack.com
Why is that?
I am doing more detailed analysis on C19 disease vs vaccine risks but the tweets below using hospitalization data from the CDC are a hint where it’s going.
A property of Covid morbidity risk being exponential with age and comorbidities is that Covid represents less than a one percent overall increase of death risk to the young — and the pre-existing risk of death to the young from all causes is already tiny. On a yearly/ seasonal basis, the pre-existing (pre C19) risk of death to the young from *all causes* was on the order of 1 in 2,500! And that includes all kids including the sickest like cancer victims.
And on a yearly/ seasonal basis the risk of death from C19 itself to the young is on the order of 1 in 300,000! This is basically spitting at the odds of being struck by lightning! If you ponder that vs the 1 in 2,500 general risk of death in the young you can now understand how the relative risk increase can be less than one percent (300,000 has two more zeros than 2,500) which you probably thought I was crazy when you first read it.
So approaching lightning strike odds of C19 death and a higher likelihood of needing serious medical attention from vaccination than C19 itself in the young — and unknown longer term effects since the current worldwide “vaccination” program *is* the long term safety trial — and it seems like Sweden and neighbors are once more winning the sanity test.
Though perhaps we can also start to sense based on this that the Scandinavians are still not *sane enough*.
More to come…
UPDATE 10/9/21 noon: More detailed analysis by me comes out roughly the same as Will on net impact but slightly different in detail:
Against my results you can argue that fewer than the total population of 0-17 has been infected than the total 73M and you can argue that it is predominantly ER visits vs hospitalizations that are counted for the vaccine (CDC isn’t clear). But no matter how hard you pull on these it’s hard to make the C19 risk higher than the vaccine risk — and certainly not by enough not to conclude this is about $$$ and not pediatric health and lives.
Iceland has totally stopped Moderna -- and Scandinavia is stopping it for younger ages
Iceland has totally stopped Moderna -- and Scandinavia is stopping it for younger ages
Iceland has totally stopped Moderna -- and Scandinavia is stopping it for younger ages
Why is that?
I am doing more detailed analysis on C19 disease vs vaccine risks but the tweets below using hospitalization data from the CDC are a hint where it’s going.
A property of Covid morbidity risk being exponential with age and comorbidities is that Covid represents less than a one percent overall increase of death risk to the young — and the pre-existing risk of death to the young from all causes is already tiny. On a yearly/ seasonal basis, the pre-existing (pre C19) risk of death to the young from *all causes* was on the order of 1 in 2,500! And that includes all kids including the sickest like cancer victims.
And on a yearly/ seasonal basis the risk of death from C19 itself to the young is on the order of 1 in 300,000! This is basically spitting at the odds of being struck by lightning! If you ponder that vs the 1 in 2,500 general risk of death in the young you can now understand how the relative risk increase can be less than one percent (300,000 has two more zeros than 2,500) which you probably thought I was crazy when you first read it.
So approaching lightning strike odds of C19 death and a higher likelihood of needing serious medical attention from vaccination than C19 itself in the young — and unknown longer term effects since the current worldwide “vaccination” program *is* the long term safety trial — and it seems like Sweden and neighbors are once more winning the sanity test.
Though perhaps we can also start to sense based on this that the Scandinavians are still not *sane enough*.
More to come…
UPDATE 10/9/21 noon: More detailed analysis by me comes out roughly the same as Will on net impact but slightly different in detail:
Against my results you can argue that fewer than the total population of 0-17 has been infected than the total 73M and you can argue that it is predominantly ER visits vs hospitalizations that are counted for the vaccine (CDC isn’t clear). But no matter how hard you pull on these it’s hard to make the C19 risk higher than the vaccine risk — and certainly not by enough not to conclude this is about $$$ and not pediatric health and lives.